3d printing houses

This is neat. They are experimenting with a variety of cheap, commonly found materials to create 3d printed objects and structures. I know NASA was working on 3D printers that could use moondust as feedstock to print whatever they would need on visits to the moon (vs having to carry everything there) – love to see that same thinking applied to structures here.



Our poor planet

\"\"Invited to the Coburn Ventures\’ annual gathering as a \”thought leader\” this week, for the fourth year in a row! – always a fun gathering of the best and most interesting thinkers (thought leaders + investment professionals) from around the globe, pondering the future direction of various technologies on business and humanity.

What to wear…always the question.

So to the intertoobz I go. And it struck me: why am I internet shopping in exactly the same way I have been since, well, pretty much the beginning of ecommerce? Searching based on some key words, ending up on a store\’s website with a bunch of thumbnails, mostly on young gazelles who I think I could probably stick two of into one of my dresses…maybe there\’s a filter, sometimes even with filtering categories I care about. Ordering 2, 3, 4 alternatives – which will be returned if not right.

Such a waste. Of time, of delivery gasoline…of raw materials. I am imagining the mountains of clothing, made in amounts forecast to be roughly correct – but then it\’s 60 degrees in November in New York, and they all waste away in some warehouse, somewhere. Or in stores….some end up in outlet stores…some go back to the manufacturers, only for some to be sent to online clearance sites…or some far away country, dumped on a market that cares less about trend.

Sigh. Our poor planet.

Where\’s my 3d printed clothing, made to my (scanned) body size, to my specs? What if I am not a 20 year old gazelle, and I want the skirt to be a few inches longer? Shorter?

Why has there been so little disintermediation in the way we shop and dress ourselves?

I ponder this as I push the \”buy\” button, and pay and extra $20 for fast delivery, contemplating all the bells, widgets, gizmos and wheels which immediately starting turning in response. And think back to this blog entry, which was based on a lot of thinking I did in 2006. 10 years!!

Our poor planet.

Presenting 3d printing

\"\"Hah! An action shot of me presenting at the Empiricist League about 2 years ago, on the future impact of 3D printing….dug up by a friend of mine.

Proud I am.

I was presenting after George Musser (former senior editor for Scientific American and the author of The Complete Idiot’s Guide to String Theory) and Chuck Blake (former research scientist at the Laboratory for Computer Science at MIT) – both very hard acts to follow. Yoda was my attempt at humor, following people of that caliber! Eeks!

Think I carried it off 😉

And yes, I really do think 3D printing will change EVERYTHING.

If you\’re interested, here\’s the presentation I gave.

Oh and if you\’re ever in Brooklyn when there\’s an Empiricist League meetup, definitely go! The organizers are geniuses at attracting amazing, world class speakers. I was honored to be included.

[pdf-embedder url=\”http://lindaricci775674310.files.wordpress.com/2016/06/linda-ricci-3d-pinring-and-the-paradox-of-time-1.pdf\” title=\”Linda Ricci – 3d pinring and the paradox of time\”]

Quantifying apparel

Fascinating work on invisibly embedding technology that measures us throughout the day (and night?)…someday wearables will be disposable, 3D printed textile-based \”devices\” that can measure whatever we, and our doctors deem important (or maybe…not so important; I call that navel gazing); then our pharma printers can supply us with our customized supplements and medicines to compensate for whatever we need.

Kayak for 3D Printing “3DPrintler” Turns Down 7-Figure Investment Offer

What an great idea! With the plethora of 3D printing services popping up, instead of having to upload a model to each, choose the materials and do a price comparison – this is brilliant. Of course 3D printing isn\’t generic though, if you\’re not printing on the same machine / resolution and quality. Still, what a fabulous idea.

Read more at 3D Printing Industry.

\"\"

I\’m presenting at The Empiricist League Tuesday, June 11th

\"\"

If you want to see me in action, I\’m presenting Tuesday (tomorrow) night on the \”Future of Fast….How 3D printing is speeding up how we make everything\” for the Empiricist League in Williamsburg, Brooklyn.

I\’m be touching on different aspects of 3D printing, from architectural applications through to bioprinting livers cells and skin grafts…and manufacturing, where I\’ll be showing some very specific examples of how I use it to help bring products to market, quickly (in my case, jewelry!).

My speech is following George Musser, a former senior editor for Scientific American and the author of The Complete Idiot’s Guide to String Theory, and Chuck Blake (a former research scientist at the Laboratory for Computer Science at MIT) so – big boots to fill! No pressure at all lol.

Here are links to some of the great source articles I used to pull this talk together:

I\’m presenting at The Empiricist League Tuesday, June 11th

\"\"

If you want to see me in action, I\’m presenting Tuesday (tomorrow) night on the \”Future of Fast….How 3D printing is speeding up how we make everything\” for the Empiricist League in Williamsburg, Brooklyn.

I\’m be touching on different aspects of 3D printing, from architectural applications through to bioprinting livers cells and skin grafts…and manufacturing, where I\’ll be showing some very specific examples of how I use it to help bring products to market, quickly (in my case, jewelry!).

My speech is following George Musser, a former senior editor for Scientific American and the author of The Complete Idiot’s Guide to String Theory, and Chuck Blake (a former research scientist at the Laboratory for Computer Science at MIT) so – big boots to fill! No pressure at all lol.

Here are links to some of the great source articles I used to pull this talk together:

Defining \”technology\”

This entry is part of a series for Handful of Salt about the role of technology in high end craft and design. Read the original article here.

 

Standardized oil paints were first sold in tubes in 1841, by Winsor Newton‘s founders from Henry Newton’s home in Rathbone Place, London.

\"medieval

To be sure – artists had been using oil paints (and a variety of ingredients) for a very, very long time. But each artist made their own; grinding pigments then adding their own proprietary blend of secret ingredients.

But then all of a sudden – oil paints, available in tubes! No grinding! No mess! No excruciatingly long, difficult and dangerous process! How disgustingly egalitarian. Why now *everyone* could, theoretically paint. I\’m sure the furor in the artistic circles was deafening.

Which is why I chuckled when I recently read the discussions around 3D printing on a leading professional jeweler\’s board…I quote: \”So now every housewife can make jewelry\”.  The voice, dripping with disgust, could be plainly \”heard\” through the computer pixels.

I sense much the same dichotomy across the craft spectrum; if CAD is even on many craftspeople\’s radars at all. Either, apparently, you are an \”artist\” who lovingly makes something by hand (preferably sacrificing for your craft by getting splinters or something), or you are an engineer, who uses a computer. There doesn\’t seem to be a lot of intersection.

\"\"

But why?  I\’m not sure why there is always such disdain by the \”old guard\” every time a game changing technology emerges, be it pre-made oil paints or CAD software. They are just tools to create with; yes, they lower the barrier to entry.

Just as the advent of commercially available tubes of paint made it possible to be more spontaneous, paint outdoors, and have at your immediate disposal more colors than before (Renoir did say that, “Without tubes of paint, there would have been no Impressionism\”).

CAD makes it possible to be intensely creative without having to spend the years apprenticing as a silver- or goldsmith; you can immediately completely visualize a design in  your head, iterating as you go – and indeed, change the nature of creation itself.

It\’s a wonderful design tool which should make any artist/craftsperson flock to the computer, I would think. The ability to visualize and refine what\’s in your head before you go make it, or indeed combine 3D printing with \”real world\” materials to create a new 3D collage – well, I think it\’s a fascinating new frontier.

Good design is still, good design, creativity still creativity – and the tools are still just the tools.

I\’d love to hear from artists & craftspeople as to what they think of this whole new emerging world, and how they are (if at all) using it.

 

 

 

 

Scroll to Top